theme ©


The punk singer (2013), dir. Sini Anderson


“Solidarity does not assume that our struggles are the same struggles, or that our pain is the same pain, or that our hope is for the same future. Solidarity involves commitment, and work, as well as the recognition that even if we do not have the same feelings, or the same lives, or the same bodies, we do live on common ground.”

— Sara Ahmed


“When governments justify war on the grounds of freedom from oppressive regimes, it helps to recognise that these justifications have a history, to refuse to hear them as ‘new’. Gayatri Spivak taught us how British imperialism was justified in these terms. Her description remains extraordinary for its precision: ‘white men saving brown women from brown men’. Homophobia too can be exercised as what ‘the others’ need liberating from: we can reformulate her description as ‘white queers saving brown queers from brown straights’. The politics of attribution is thus a central mechanism for establishing the moral grounds for war. When homophobia is attributed to Islam, it becomes a cultural attribute. Homophobia would then be viewed as intrinsic to Islam, as a cultural attribute, but homophobia in the West would be viewed as extrinsic, as an individual attribute.”

Sara Ahmed, on “Why Critiques of Gay Imperialism Matter”

I prefer to use: “white knights in rainbow-coloured armour, saving the dark-skinned ones in distress”




New installation by Pip & Pop in Kurashiki, Okayama: Through a Hole in the Mountain


Tis the Candy Kingdom


A convoy of more than 20 military vehicles drove through the centre of Glasgow on the M74 shortly after midnight last night. The convoy included four special lorries which transport Trident nuclear bombs. The convoy was stopped for one hour near Loch Lomond by protestors from Faslane Peace Camp. One climbed on top of a nuclear transporter. Four peace campers were arrested. 

Scottish CND coordinator, John Ainslie, followed the convoy as it drove along the M74 from Hamilton, through the South of Glasgow, then over the Erskine Bridge. Mr Ainslie said, “This is an insult to the people of Glasgow and the rest of Scotland. Only 10 weeks before we vote on whether to be independent, the UK Government have sent this massive convoy of Weapons of Mass Destruction through the centre of Scotland’s largest city. The convoy was probably carrying six Trident bombs, each one seven times more powerful than the bomb which destroyed Hiroshima in 1945. This should be taken as a clear reminder of why people need to vote Yes - to rid Scotland of these horrific nuclear weapons.” 


is it a boy or girl?


when you know it ends, don’t try to skip it, you ain’t gonna keep it 

op op



These people are doin’ Halloween right. 







Who is responsible for this

this works way 2 well tbh

316813 listens


Going bald at 26 and not giving a shit.


Casual, understated-looking Divine, just chilling out.

Features of the socialist argument for Scottish Independence



A sense of panic had begun to grip the British establishment as the break up of the United Kingdom looms as a possibility. A sense of panic had begun to grip the British establishment as the break up of the United Kingdom looms as a possibility. Socialists should support the dissolution of a key imperialist state and that the left has been able to shape the independence campaign. argues socialists should support the dissolution of a key imperialist state and that the left has been able to shape the independence campaign.

With two months to go until the Scottish Independence referendum there is a serious whiff of panic coming out of Westminster and from across the Atlantic. Growing fears that opinion polls continue to show a narrowing of the No camp’s lead to around 8 percent have prompted both Barack Obama at the G7 summit and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to pitch in to defend the need for a “strong, robust and united Britain”.

Their intervention follows that of ex- Nato general secretary and former UK minister of defence George Robertson. He warns that “independence would be cataclysmic for the world” and that “the forces of darkness”, Britain’s enemies, “would love it”. The right wing pro-war think tank Royal United Services Institute bluntly declare in its April 2014 report Dissolution and Defence that “a Yes vote would leave the rest of the UK in a state of humiliation and existential crisis having to ask difficult questions about its own identity (including its name and flag).”

Cameron faces the nightmarish prospect of being the last prime minister of Great Britain! For the coalition government a defeat in the referendum coming so close off the back of losing the European elections to Ukip will trigger a major political crisis that could feasibly lead to the collapse of the coalition before the general election in 2015. In other words, the stakes for the British and American ruling class are incredibly high. As Tommy Sheridan has been putting it at his highly successful pro-independence Hope Over Fear tour of Scotland, “It’s squeaky bum time for the British establishment.”

For socialists it is the desire and real opportunity that the referendum gifts us to undermine and weaken British and US imperialism that is at the core of why we are actively throwing our weight into the Yes campaign. There are two main anti-imperialist grounds that make Scottish independence worthy of full support north and south of the border and indeed across the world.

Firstly, independence for Scotland would diminish Britain’s role as the junior partner to US imperialism, seriously weakening both sides of the so called “special relationship”. In practice the break-up of the British state would make it much harder for what’s left of the rest of the UK to support further US military adventures and illegal wars in countries like Syria and across the wider Middle East.

On the tenth anniversary of the Iraq war it is not lost on the hundreds of thousands of Scottish people who took to the streets of Glasgow to say Not In Our Name that Bush and Blair’s wars left a legacy of devastation and destruction. The cost of both these wars to Britain alone has been £55 billion. That’s money that would have been better spent on education, pensions and the NHS. It is also the tenth anniversary of the death of a young Scottish soldier, Gordon Gentle, who lost his life needlessly in Iraq, a war based on lies. Put simply, a Yes vote is a vote against more immoral and illegal imperialist wars.

Secondly, the removal of Trident nuclear submarines from the Clyde would be a massive blow to Britain’s position as a leading nuclear state and a real threat to the ability of the US to use Britain as a launch pad for its missiles in Europe. The generals in Washington and at Nato HQ are terrified of losing the Faslane nuclear naval base. This is because they are acutely aware that there are no other deep waters around the UK to host Trident that won’t involve spending tens of billions of pounds to relocate it.

Furthermore, the £100 billion that it is costing to upgrade Trident could be saved and invested in creating thousands of green jobs and helping to combat climate change. “Losing” Trident would help relegate Britain from its top position in the pecking order of world states. What is causing apoplexy among our rulers is that Britain may lose its seat at the top table of the United Nations Security Council. That is a very good reason for voting Yes in its own right.

The whole issue of Trident is closely tied up with Britain’s membership of Nato. Britain has been a major player in Nato’s failed and bloody operations in Afghanistan. It also led the bombing of Libya and is now menacingly threatening to bomb Iraq again and increase its involvement in countries like Ukraine. An independent Scotland that stood outside of Nato could not only avoid being embroiled in more US/UK led wars but also make it more difficult for American imperialism to act as the world’s military policeman.

The Nato question in the referendum campaign is also significant because Alex Salmond and the Scottish National Party (SNP) have ditched an immensely popular 30 year old policy of opposing Nato in favour of being in the nuclear club, albeit while opposing Trident. Socialists and anti-war activists will need to fight to ensure that an independent Scotland quits Nato and be ready to oppose Salmond and an SNP which is committed to staying in this nuclear club.

The ideology of unionism is being nakedly exposed for its xenophobia, its racism and anti-immigrant hysteria. An overload of scare stories from the media about floods of immigrants coming to sponge off an independent Scotland and blaming immigrants for unemployment, poor housing and every other social problem is the order of the day. It is this toxic brand of British nationalism that has contributed to Ukip winning its first ever elected seat in Scotland at the European elections.

British nationalism is the main danger that must be opposed, whatever our criticisms of Scottish nationalism, and there are plenty. Socialists are putting anti-racism at the heart of the Yes campaign and are challenging Cameron’s view of a Christian Britain and his jingoism about Britain’s civilising role during the First World War. Recently Humza Yousaf, the SNP minister for external affairs stated that one of his first wishes for an independent Scotland is to shut down the gates of Dungavel Immigration Detention centre. We share that vision and will hold any new Scottish government to it.

A central plank of the independence movement has been opposition to more Tory austerity. The campaign has not been characterised by a narrow and hardened Scottish nationalism. On the contrary, the independence movement and its various offshoots — Radical Independence campaign, Women for Independence, Tommy Sheridan’s Hope Over Fear tour — have fast become a political lightning conductor for much of the class anger that exists against austerity.

This class anger is finding its political expression in raised hopes and expectations of a Scotland that is opposed to privatisation, zero-hours contracts, child poverty and the whole package of neoliberalism on offer from Britain Plc. One sign of how much opposition there is to Tory austerity is in a recent opinion poll that shows if workers in Scotland think there is going to be another Tory government in Westminster in 2015 support for independence moves from 43 percent to a majority of 59 percent.

Yet there are many good trade unionists and labour movement activists who are opposed to independence. The Red Paper Collective, which is made up of Labour Party members, the Communist Party and some left trade union officials, is putting a left wing version of the No position. They argue that a Yes vote will lead to a divided working class and is tantamount to abandoning the unity of Scottish, English and Welsh workers that was forged out of the great battles of the Chartists, the General Strike of 1926 and up to the defeat of Thatcher’s hated poll tax in 1990.

Even Gordon Brown has tried to invoke the spirit of Red Clydeside to appeal to trade unionists to support remaining part of Britain. But it is a grave mistake for some socialists to give left wing cover to the pro-union case on the grounds that this is how to preserve workers’ unity.

Workers’ unity
The unity of the British state and the unity of the working class are not the same thing. Unity between workers north and south of the border does not rest on the maintenance of the British state or the capitalist interests it represents. Neither will the need and opportunity for solidarity between workers north and south disappear if Scotland becomes independent. There is a rich history of workers supporting each other against unscrupulous bosses: from the great miners’ strike of 1984-85 to the poll tax.

Workers in Scotland should continue to make every effort to build unity and solidarity with each other and share the lessons and take confidence from what we are able to achieve in the struggles against austerity with workers in England and Wales and vice versa.

The other position put by the left No camp is that Westminster is the only institution capable of confronting multinational capitalism and neoliberalism. Yet corporations like Amazon, Starbucks and Vodafone have all managed to avoid paying their taxes, while privatisation, lower corporation taxes and tax evasion have been driven forward by successive Labour governments over the last 30 years. There is no evidence that Westminster has any plans to reverse this process under Labour. So whatever way you package it the No camp inevitably rallies forces behind proausterity parties of the Better Together that are committed to making huge cuts and attacks on workers’ living standards in the future.

Interestingly, there are serious splits developing inside the Labour Party and the trade unions as it becomes more difficult to defend voting No. Former president of the STUC Pat Rafferty has declared his support for independence as has Stephen Smellie, a key Unison activist in the Labour party. George Mudie, MP for Leeds East has come out as a Yes supporter. Labour for Independence are attracting a lot of support as they argue that independence will create the chance to reclaim the Labour Party and take it back to its old roots and the traditions of Keir Hardie.

For the SWP in Scotland it will be important to stress that the far left must continue to engage actively in the Yes campaign and put anti-imperialism and anti-austerity politics at the centre of the debates. To take advantage of the current radicalisation and to win real gains for the working class this will necessarily have to involve more struggle from below whether Scotland remains inside or outside of the Union.

English and Welsh socialists have a role to play here too. We invite you to come to Scotland over the summer and help us put an end to the British state and win the referendum.

Source:- http://socialistreview.org.uk/393/scotland-independence-and-left

aye for scotland